From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duro-Test Corporation v. Ward

Supreme Court, Special Term, Cayuga County
Oct 8, 1958
17 Misc. 2d 1028 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1958)

Opinion

October 8, 1958

Gleason Doyle ( John P. Doyle of counsel), for plaintiff.

Michaels, Port Cuddy ( George M. Michaels of counsel), for defendant.


The complaint does not allege that defendant has violated any confidence. His fault is that he, in violation of the contract, has accepted employment from a competitor of plaintiff. Against this, plaintiff is not entitled to protection (General Business Law, § 340).

The contract is too broad in its terms and is unenforcible. ( Paramount Pad Co. v. Baumrind, 4 N.Y.2d 393; Murray v. Cooper, 268 App. Div. 411, affd. 294 N.Y. 658.)

The motion is granted with $10 costs.


Summaries of

Duro-Test Corporation v. Ward

Supreme Court, Special Term, Cayuga County
Oct 8, 1958
17 Misc. 2d 1028 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1958)
Case details for

Duro-Test Corporation v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:DURO-TEST CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD H. WARD, Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Cayuga County

Date published: Oct 8, 1958

Citations

17 Misc. 2d 1028 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1958)
193 N.Y.S.2d 824

Citing Cases

Duro-Test Corp. v. Donaghy

I do believe, however, that the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction pending the trial of this…