From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durlak v. Sun Chemical Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Dec 30, 1948
336 Ill. App. 310 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)

Opinion

Gen. No. 44,562. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed December 30, 1948 Released for publication January 21, 1949

MASTER AND SERVANT, § 16vacation pay. Where employee, paid monthly, advised employer by letter that he planned to resign on June 1, and employer's letter accepting resignation stated that it was "to become effective June 1st," contract of employment was "terminated" by mutual agreement on that day and employee, although he performed no services in June, was entitled to vacation pay under provisions of employer's interoffice communication providing that employees whose services were terminated on or after June 1 and who had not received their earned vacation allowance should be entitled to vacation pay determined by number of months of continuous service prior to that date.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. GEORGE L. QUILICI, Judge, presiding.

Judgment affirmed. Heard in the third division, first district, this court at the October term, 1948.

Scott, MacLeish Falk, for appellant;

Clifford C. Pratt and Joseph A. Dubbs, of counsel;

Arthur A. Basse, for appellee.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed December 30, 1948; released for publication January 21, 1949.


Summaries of

Durlak v. Sun Chemical Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Dec 30, 1948
336 Ill. App. 310 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
Case details for

Durlak v. Sun Chemical Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Walter C. Durlak, Appellee, v. Sun Chemical Corporation, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Dec 30, 1948

Citations

336 Ill. App. 310 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
83 N.E.2d 372

Citing Cases

Nogee v. Neisner Bros., Inc.

That was a case of a contract for a term which had more than a year to run, and it was there stated that a…