From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durkin v. Durkin Fuel Acquisition Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1996
224 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 20, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.).


Ordered that the order in Action No. 1 is affirmed; and it is further;

Ordered that the order in Action No. 2 is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that Durkin Fuel Acquisition Corp. and Robinson Oil Corp. are awarded one bill of costs.

The terms of the restrictive covenant in this case are reasonable under the circumstances ( see, Karpinski v. Ingrasci, 28 N.Y.2d 45; Town Line Repairs v. Anderson, 90 A.D.2d 517), and justify a preliminary injunction in Action No. 2.

With respect to the appeal from the order in Action No. 1, we note only that permanent injunctions and declaratory judgments are not provisional remedies and may not be obtained in a motion prior to the joinder of issue ( see, CPLR 103, 3001, 3211, 3212, 6301 et seq.). Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Durkin v. Durkin Fuel Acquisition Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1996
224 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Durkin v. Durkin Fuel Acquisition Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND C. DURKIN et al., Appellants, v. DURKIN FUEL ACQUISITION CORP. et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 20, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 716

Citing Cases

Schimmel v. Pfizer, Inc.

Declaratory judgments may not be granted prior to the joinder of issue ( Durkin v Durkin Fuel Acquisition…

Rahman v. Bengal Poultry, Inc.

In this motion, plaintiffs seek the identical and ultimate relief sought in their complaint. A permanent…