Summary
In Joseph v. Dougherty, 60 Cal. 360, it was held that when an instrument was signed and acknowledged by a married woman it was executed; and in Hutchinson v. Ainsworth, 73 Cal. 458, 2 Am. St. Rep. 823, the court clearly indicates that the notary's certificate is no part of the conveyance, where it is said: "The conveyance, then, having been properly executed and acknowledged (though not properly certified), was valid as between the parties to it and all the world, except subsequent bona fide purchasers," etc.
Summary of this case from Banbury v. ArnoldOpinion
Department One
Appeal from an order in Fourth District Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Evans, J.
COUNSEL
Mich. Mullany, for Appellant.
A. N. Drown, for Respondents.
OPINION The Court:
On the authority of Grant v. Burr , 54 Cal. 298, and Bateman v. Burr , 57 id. 480, the order is affirmed.