From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durham v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 12, 2001
790 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 2001)

Opinion

No. SC00-913

Opinion filed July 12, 2001.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance Fifth District — Case No. 5D99-1890 (Orange County)

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Petitioner Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Respondent


We have for review a decision on the following question certified to be of great public importance:

DOES THE CRIME OF ATTEMPTED SECOND DEGREE MURDER EXIST IN FLORIDA?

Durham v. State, 753 So.2d 781, 781 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. We recently answered the same certified question in the affirmative in Brown v. State, 26 Fla. L. Weekly S382 (Fla. Oct. 5, 2000). Accordingly, we approve the result in Durham on this issue.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

HARDING, J., dissents with an opinion, in which ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Brown v. State, 26 Fla. L. Weekly S382, S382-85 (Fla. Oct. 5, 2000).

ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Durham v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 12, 2001
790 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 2001)
Case details for

Durham v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROGER DURHAM, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 12, 2001

Citations

790 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 2001)