From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durand v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Feb 10, 2021
312 So. 3d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 4D20-1948

02-10-2021

Kendall DURAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Kendall Durand, Mayo, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Kendall Durand, Mayo, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Kendall Durand appeals an order denying his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence. Durand was convicted of first-degree murder with a firearm and attempted first-degree murder with a firearm and was sentenced to two consecutive terms of life in prison. In his rule 3.800(a) motion, he argued that his sentences are illegal because the court failed to impose the three-year mandatory minimum sentences required by section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1996), for possession of a firearm.

We affirm the order denying Durand's motion because any illegality in failing to impose the mandatory minimum sentences is in his favor and cannot be challenged. Mitchell v. State , No. 4D20-860, ––– So. 3d ––––, ––––, 2020 WL 6154241, at *2 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 21, 2020) ; see also Earl v. State , 276 So. 3d 359 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019), rev. granted , No. SC19-1506, 2019 WL 6490732 (Fla. Dec. 3, 2019). We again certify conflict with Solomon v. State , 254 So. 3d 1121 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018), Burks v. State , 237 So. 3d 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), and Vargas v. State , 188 So. 3d 915 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

Levine, C.J, Gross and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Durand v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Feb 10, 2021
312 So. 3d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Durand v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENDALL DURAND, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 10, 2021

Citations

312 So. 3d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)