From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durand v. Maritza

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 22, 2022
3:22-cv-00371-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 22, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00371-MMD-CLB

11-22-2022

ROBERTO DURAND, Plaintiff v. MARITZA, Defendant


ORDER

(ECF NOS. 4, 5, 6)

I. DISCUSSION

On September 15, 2022, this Court ordered Plaintiff to file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the full $402 filing fee for a civil action on or before November 15, 2022. (ECF No. 3 at 2.) The Court explained that Plaintiff's initial application to proceed in forma pauperis was incomplete because Plaintiff had not included a financial certificate or an inmate account statement for the previous six-month period. (Id. at 1.)

Plaintiff has filed three new applications to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 4, 5, 6.) Each of these new applications includes a financial certificate, but none of them includes an inmate account statement for the previous six-month period. Because none of the new applications to proceed in forma pauperis include an inmate account statement for the previous six-month period, all three applications are incomplete, and the Court denies all three applications without prejudice.

Because it appears that an extension of the initial deadline and another court order are meaningful alternatives to dismissal here, the Court will grant Plaintiff one final opportunity to submit an inmate account statement for the previous six-month period to the Court on or before January 23, 2023. See Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986) (providing that “district court need not exhaust every sanction short of dismissal before finally dismissing a case, but must explore possible and meaningful alternatives”).

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's applications to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 4, 5, 6) are denied without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before January 23, 2023, Plaintiff shall either: (1) file a fully complete IFP application, on the correct form with complete financial attachments, including an inmate account statement for the previous six-month period, in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); or (2) pay the full $402 fee for filing a civil action (which includes the $350 filing fee and the $52 administrative fee).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order, this case will be subject to dismissal without prejudice for Plaintiff to refile the case with the Court, under a new case number, when Plaintiff is able to submit a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the full $402 filing fee for a civil action.


Summaries of

Durand v. Maritza

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 22, 2022
3:22-cv-00371-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Durand v. Maritza

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTO DURAND, Plaintiff v. MARITZA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 22, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00371-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 22, 2022)