From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duran v. Santa Clara Cnty.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 8, 2021
18-cv-04832-CRB (N.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2021)

Opinion

18-cv-04832-CRB

09-08-2021

MARIA A. DURAN, Plaintiff, v. SANTA CLARA COUNTY, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In August 2018, Plaintiff Maria Duran sued Defendant Santa Clara County. See Compl. (dkt. 1). That same month. Magistrate Judge Cousins denied Duran's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and set a deadline of September 12, 2018, for Duran to submit an amended IFP application or to pay the Court's filing fee. See Order (dkt. 7). The case was reassigned to the undersigned Judge on August 27, 2018. Since then, nothing has happened. Accordingly, the Court hereby orders Duran to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee and failure to prosecute. Duran may file a response to this order on or before September 22, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Duran v. Santa Clara Cnty.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 8, 2021
18-cv-04832-CRB (N.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Duran v. Santa Clara Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MARIA A. DURAN, Plaintiff, v. SANTA CLARA COUNTY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 8, 2021

Citations

18-cv-04832-CRB (N.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2021)