From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duran v. Duran

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec 21, 2016
208 So. 3d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 3D16–823

12-21-2016

Katia Maria DURAN, Appellant, v. Ramon Jose DURAN, Appellee.

A. Antonio Tomas, for appellant. Harvey D. Rogers, for appellee.


A. Antonio Tomas, for appellant.

Harvey D. Rogers, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

The former wife seeks review of the trial court's amended final judgment of injunction against domestic violence in favor of the former husband. After a careful review of the testimony in the record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment below. "The trial court is afforded broad discretion in granting, denying, dissolving, or modifying injunctions, and unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated, an appellate court must not disturb the trial court's decision." Jackson v. Echols , 937 So.2d 1247, 1249 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Duran v. Duran

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec 21, 2016
208 So. 3d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Duran v. Duran

Case Details

Full title:Katia Maria DURAN, Appellant, v. Ramon Jose DURAN, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Dec 21, 2016

Citations

208 So. 3d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)