From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duran v. Crandell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 19, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02490-PAB-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02490-PAB-KMT

09-19-2011

JOSEPH LOUIS DURAN, Plaintiff, v. DENEEN CRANDELL, PSY. D., and SGT. LEE MARTINEZ, RETIRED, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's "Motion for Court Assistance with Legal Mail Processing Denials." (Doc. No. 88, filed Sept. 16, 2011.) It appears that Plaintiff seeks an order requiring that certain San Carlos Correctional Facility correctional officers process Plaintiff's legal mail at his request so that it may be received by this court.

Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. No. 88) is DENIED. The court declines to interfere in the day-to-day activities of prison administration. See Bell v. Wolfish, 411 U.S. 520, 547-84 (1979) (noting that courts must ordinarily defer to prison administrators in the adoption and execution of policies and practices to preserve order and maintain institutional security).


Summaries of

Duran v. Crandell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 19, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02490-PAB-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Duran v. Crandell

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH LOUIS DURAN, Plaintiff, v. DENEEN CRANDELL, PSY. D., and SGT. LEE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02490-PAB-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 19, 2011)