From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duran v. Borla

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 20, 2024
5:22-cv-01052-JGB (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2024)

Opinion

5:24-cv-00179-JFW (GJS)

11-20-2024

CESAR VEGA DURAN, Petitioner v. E. BORLA, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER: ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; AND DENYING MOTION

JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition in this case (Dkt. 1) and all relevant pleadings and other documents filed and lodged in this action, Petitioner's “Motion and Declaration for Discovery Pursuant to Rule 6, Habeas Corpus” (Dkt. 3, “Motion”), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 23, “Report”). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed and no Objections have been received by the Court. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition is denied; (2) the Motion is denied; (3) Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is denied; and (4) the Petition is dismissed with prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Duran v. Borla

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 20, 2024
5:22-cv-01052-JGB (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Duran v. Borla

Case Details

Full title:CESAR VEGA DURAN, Petitioner v. E. BORLA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 20, 2024

Citations

5:22-cv-01052-JGB (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2024)