From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duque v. Alcazar

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 5, 2021
2:21-cv-0523 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0523 JAM CKD P

11-05-2021

JASON ALLEN DUQUE, Plaintiff, v. MANNY ALCAZAR, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On September 21, 2021 plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Duque v. Alcazar

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 5, 2021
2:21-cv-0523 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Duque v. Alcazar

Case Details

Full title:JASON ALLEN DUQUE, Plaintiff, v. MANNY ALCAZAR, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 5, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0523 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2021)