Summary
maintaining commercial/residential distinction
Summary of this case from Luchejko v. the City of HobokenOpinion
A-10 September Term 2002
Argued January 21, 2003
Decided February 24, 2003
On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 351 N.J. Super. 237 (2002).
CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ and JUSTICES COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and ALBIN join in this opinion.
Mitchell J. Makowicz, Jr., argued the cause for appellant (Blume, Goldfaden, Berkowitz, Donnelly, Fried Forte, attorneys).
Barry A. Knopf argued the cause for respondent (Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann Knopf, attorneys; Mr. Knopf and Albert L. Cohn, of counsel; Audra DePaolo, on the brief).
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Newman's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 351 N.J. Super. 237 (2002).