Dunwiddie v. Central Locating Service, Ltd.

Full title: KENT DUNWIDDIE, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated…

Court: United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division

Date published: Apr 7, 2006

Case No. 5:04-cv-315-OC-10GRJ (M.D. Fla. Apr. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 5:04-cv-315-OC-10GRJ.

April 7, 2006

ORDER

WILLIAM HODGES, Senior District Judge

On November 14, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. 220) recommending that the Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Dismiss the Claims of the Washington Plaintiffs Without Prejudice (Doc. 218) be granted. Because developments in the case arose after the Magistrate Judge issued his report, the Court re-referred the Plaintiffs' motion for further consideration (Doc. 225). This case is presently before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Amended Report and Recommendation (Doc. 231), which recommends that the Plaintiffs' motion be granted. There have been no objections to the Magistrate Judge's amended report, and the time for doing so has lapsed.

Upon an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration, it is ordered that:

(1) the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 231) is adopted, confirmed and made a part hereof;

(2) the Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Dismiss the Claims of the Washington Plaintiffs Without Prejudice (Doc. 218) is GRANTED;

(3) the Washington Plaintiffs¹ are DISMISSED without prejudice; and

1 See Doc. 218, Exh. 1.

(4) the Clerk is directed to terminate the Washington Plaintiffs as parties to this action and withhold entry of judgment pending resolution of this case as a whole.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DONE and ORDERED.