From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunung v. Singh

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 26, 2016
135 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

01-26-2016

In re Sanjoyt DUNUNG, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Deepak SINGH, Respondent–Appellant.

Corey M. Shapiro, New York, for appellant. Sanjoyt P. Dunung, respondent pro se.


Corey M. Shapiro, New York, for appellant.

Sanjoyt P. Dunung, respondent pro se.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Susan K. Knipps, J.), entered on or about March 18, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, denied respondent father's objection to a support magistrate's order that he pay half of the private school expenses at the United Nations International School (UNIS) for two of his children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Family Court properly accorded due deference to the Support Magistrate's credibility determinations (see Coggeshall Painting & Restoration Co. v. Zetlin, 282 A.D.2d 364, 365, 723 N.Y.S.2d 656 [1st Dept.2001] ), including its finding that the father did not previously object to his children attending private school at UNIS. Further, Family Court properly adopted the Support Magistrate's conclusion that the father has the financial ability to contribute to the children's private school expenses, as that determination is supported by the record, including the terms of the parties' settlement agreement (see Banco Espírito Santo, S.A. v. Concessionária Do Rodoanel Oeste S.A., 100 A.D.3d 100, 106, 951 N.Y.S.2d 19 [1st Dept.2012] ).

We have considered the father's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., RENWICK, SAXE, MOSKOWITZ, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dunung v. Singh

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 26, 2016
135 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Dunung v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:In re Sanjoyt DUNUNG, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Deepak SINGH…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 26, 2016

Citations

135 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 444
22 N.Y.S.3d 871

Citing Cases

Shannon K. v. Amir S.

We decline to review the issue, but as an alternative holding, find that pursuant to both Florida and New…

Jurgita C. v. Manuel O.

Although he demonstrated some effort in securing employment in the area of his experience, the father's…