From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunson v. Conrad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Mar 4, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00116-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00116-MP-EMT

03-04-2013

CLARENCE L DUNSON, Plaintiff, v. SHARYL CONRAD, DAFFIN, BUDDY KENT, MCKINNEY, MCKINNEY, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 11, entitled "Affidavit of Claims" and Doc. 12, a motion to appoint counsel, and Doc. 13, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Upon review, the Court construes the Affidavit of Claims as a motion to reconsider the order and judgment dismissing this case pursuant to the "three strikes rule." Docs. 9 & 10. Nothing in these documents justifies revisiting the dismissal. Accordingly it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Doc. 11, 12 and 13 are denied.

_______________

Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Dunson v. Conrad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Mar 4, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00116-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Dunson v. Conrad

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE L DUNSON, Plaintiff, v. SHARYL CONRAD, DAFFIN, BUDDY KENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00116-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 4, 2013)