Opinion
No. 06-76323.
Submitted: December 21, 2006.
Decided: January 5, 2007.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:06-cv-00573-RWT).
Charles A. Dunn, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Joseph Crawford, ALDELMAN, SHEFF SMITH, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Charles A. Dunn, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Dunn's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dunn v. Tessema, No. 8:06-cv-00573-RWT (D. Md. filed Sept. 7, 2006; entered Sept. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED