From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 15, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2731 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2731 JAM GGH P

08-15-2012

JOHN DUNN, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. Petitioner asks that the court appoint Tracy Renee Lum as counsel, an attorney who represented petitioner at his appearance before the Board of Parole Hearings in 2011. While in the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this time, Ms. Lum may seek to be substituted in for petitioner as counsel.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's July 25, 2012 and August 2, 2012 motions for appointment of counsel (Docket Nos. 16 & 19) are denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Dunn v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 15, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2731 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Dunn v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DUNN, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 15, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2731 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2012)