From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. State

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Mar 21, 2012
No. 10-11-00047-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 21, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-11-00047-CR

03-21-2012

SHAWN DUNN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


From the 52nd District Court

Coryell County, Texas

Trial Court No. FR-10-20260


MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found Shawn Dunn guilty of the felony offense of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, and the trial court assessed a seventy-year prison sentence. Dunn appealed. Dunn's appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

In an Anders case, we must, "after a full examination of all the proceedings, [] decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is "wholly frivolous" or "without merit" when it "lacks any basis in law or fact." McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988).

Dunn filed a pro se response to the Anders brief. We find that it does not raise any potentially arguable issues. And we have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find this appeal to be wholly frivolous, we affirm the judgment. Counsel must send Dunn a copy of our decision by certified mail, return receipt requested, at Dunn's last known address. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4. Counsel must also notify Dunn of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Id.; see also Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 673-74 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We grant counsel's motion to withdraw, effective upon counsel's compliance with this notification requirement as evidenced by "a letter [to this Court] certifying his compliance." See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4.

Dunn's pro se motion to reverse conviction for improper grand jury procedures is denied.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Affirmed; motion to reverse denied Do not publish
[CRPM]


Summaries of

Dunn v. State

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Mar 21, 2012
No. 10-11-00047-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Dunn v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN DUNN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Mar 21, 2012

Citations

No. 10-11-00047-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 21, 2012)

Citing Cases

Dunn v. State

The Tenth Court of Appeals affirmed appellant's conviction for aggravated robbery on March 21, 2012, and the…

Dunn v. State

In 2012, the Tenth Court of Appeals affirmed Appellant's conviction for aggravated robbery. Dunn v. State,…