From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Mar 24, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0027 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 24, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0027 SECTION P

03-24-2020

GEORGE DEWAYNE DUNN v. JAY RUSSELL, ET AL.


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 11], of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objection [Doc. No. 13] thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff George Dewayne Dunn's claims against Sheriff Jay Russell, Warden Pat Johnson, Captain Campbell, and Lieutenant Stewart are DISMISSED as frivolous and for failing to state claims on which relief may be granted.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 24th day of March, 2020.

/s/_________

TERRY A. DOUGHTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dunn v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Mar 24, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0027 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 24, 2020)
Case details for

Dunn v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE DEWAYNE DUNN v. JAY RUSSELL, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 24, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0027 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 24, 2020)