From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Park Harbor Improvement Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Aug 26, 2021
No. 01-21-00010-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 26, 2021)

Opinion

01-21-00010-CV

08-26-2021

Oddis Dunn v. Park Harbor Improvement Association, Inc. and Its Commercial Members


234th District Court of Harris County, Trial court case number: 2020-06897

ORDER

Richard Hightower, Judge

Appellant's counsel filed a motion to withdraw and appellant is in agreement with his counsel's withdrawal. Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw.

Before counsel withdrew, counsel had filed appellant's brief. Appellant has asked that we permit him to proceed pro se. Appellant has also filed a motion to strike the brief filed by counsel because appellant tendered a pro se appellant's brief. We grant the motion to strike and strike the appellant's brief filed on July 2, 2021. Because the Court has granted the motion to withdraw, appellant may proceed pro se. As construed to be a motion to permit appellant to proceed pro se, the motion to reconsider is also granted.

The Court has reviewed appellant's pro se brief and has determined that it does not comply with the Rule 38.1 requirements. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. Appellant's pro se brief fails to include the following:

(1) an index of authorities, see TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(c);
(2) a statement of the case supported by record references, see TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(d);
(3) a statement regarding oral argument, see TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(e);
(4) citations to the record in the statement of facts, see TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(g);
(5) a summary of the argument, see TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(h);
(6) argument containing both citations to the record and to authorities, see TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(i); and
(7) a prayer for relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(j).

We strike appellant's brief filed on August 3, 2021, and order appellant to file a brief correcting the deficiencies listed and in compliance with Rule 38.1 on or before September 23, 2021. Appellee's brief will be due 30 days after appellant files a corrected brief.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dunn v. Park Harbor Improvement Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Aug 26, 2021
No. 01-21-00010-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Dunn v. Park Harbor Improvement Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:Oddis Dunn v. Park Harbor Improvement Association, Inc. and Its Commercial…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Aug 26, 2021

Citations

No. 01-21-00010-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 26, 2021)