From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Montgomery

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 20, 2021
2:21-cv-2103-CJC (MAR) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-2103-CJC (MAR)

10-20-2021

MICHAEL DUNN, Petitioner, v. MONTGOMERY, Respondents.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY United States District Judge

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Dunn v. Montgomery

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 20, 2021
2:21-cv-2103-CJC (MAR) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Dunn v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DUNN, Petitioner, v. MONTGOMERY, Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 20, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-2103-CJC (MAR) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2021)