From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Mercedes Benz of Ft. Washington, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 10, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1662 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 10, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1662

02-10-2012

REGINA DUNN and PATRICE MACHIKAS, Plaintiffs, v. MERCEDES BENZ OF FT. WASHINGTON, INC. et al., Defendants.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 9th day of February, 2012, upon careful consideration of plaintiff Regina Dunn's motion for partial summary judgment against corporate defendants Mercedes-Benz of Fort Washington, Inc., and Condor Automotive Group, LLC (document no. 40), the corporate defendants' opposition thereto, and Dunn's reply, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. Trial in this matter is scheduled for April 16, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.

______________

William H. Yohn, Jr., Judge


Summaries of

Dunn v. Mercedes Benz of Ft. Washington, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 10, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1662 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Dunn v. Mercedes Benz of Ft. Washington, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:REGINA DUNN and PATRICE MACHIKAS, Plaintiffs, v. MERCEDES BENZ OF FT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 10, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1662 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 10, 2012)

Citing Cases

Mazur v. Sw. Veterans Ctr.

If the party seeking sanctions proves spoliation, the court may sanction the offending party. Dunn v.…

Jacobs v. City of Pittsburgh

If the party seeking sanctions proves spoliation, the court may sanction the offending party. Dunn v.…