Opinion
22-35334
05-11-2023
JAMES E. DUNN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Submitted May 9, 2023 [**]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. 3:21-cv-05413-MLP, Michelle L. Peterson, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM [*]
James Dunn appeals the district court's affirmance of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of his application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. We review the underlying decision of the administrative law judge ("ALJ") to determine whether it is based on legal error or not supported by substantial evidence. Lambert v. Saul, 980 F.3d 1266, 1270 (9th Cir. 2020) (citation omitted). We affirm.
Because Dunn's claim for benefits was filed before March 27, 2017, the Social Security regulations and standards as propounded prior to the 2017 amendments apply to this case. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527.
The ALJ's decision to assign low weight to the opinion of Dr. Lear (an examining physician) was based on specific and legitimate reasons supported by substantial evidence, including that the opinion was inconsistent with (1) the overall medical evidence in the record, such as the treatment notes-which state that Dunn had "normal gait," "strong neurological functioning of the extremities," "stable postsurgical findings," and no edema, see Garrison v. Colvin, 759 F.3d 995, 1012 (9th Cir. 2014); (2) evidence of Dunn's activities of daily living, see Ford v. Saul, 950 F.3d 1141, 1155 (9th Cir. 2020); and (3) evidence of Dunn's demonstrated ability to concentrate.
The ALJ did not err in assigning low weight to Dunn's testimony because the ALJ offered "specific, clear, and convincing reasons for discrediting [Dunn]'s" testimony. Garrison, 759 F.3d at 1010. The ALJ discussed in detail several inconsistencies between that testimony and the record before the Commissioner, including the objective medical evidence presented to the Commissioner, Smartt v. Kijakazi, 53 F.4th 489, 498 (9th Cir. 2022), Dunn's reported activities of daily living, Batson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 359 F.3d 1190, 1196 (9th Cir. 2004); see also Smartt, 53 F.4th at 500 n.3, and the absence of medical evidence supporting Dunn's stated lack of improvement, diminished memory and concentration, leg swelling, and need for an assistive device.
Dunn forfeited his remaining arguments "because he did not raise them before the district court." Greger v. Barnhart, 464 F.3d 968, 973 (9th Cir. 2006); see also Smartt, 53 F.4th at 495 ("We need not consider [claimant]'s remaining arguments, which are waived because [he] raises them for the first time on appeal.").
AFFIRMED.
[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).