From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 22, 1964
166 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 1964)

Opinion

No. 33318.

July 22, 1964.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

E.O. Palermo, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos Evans, Tampa, for petitioners.

Philip J. Rogers, of Masterson, Lloyd Rogers, St. Petersburg, for respondent Willie B. Holmes.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondent Florida Industrial Commission.


By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 13, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dunn v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 22, 1964
166 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 1964)
Case details for

Dunn v. Holmes

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT H. DUNN AND THE MANHATTAN FIRE MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 22, 1964

Citations

166 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 1964)