From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Hill

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 30, 2007
Civil No. 07-420-TC (D. Or. May. 30, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-420-TC.

May 30, 2007


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on May 14, 2007. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.


Summaries of

Dunn v. Hill

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 30, 2007
Civil No. 07-420-TC (D. Or. May. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Dunn v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL TODD DUNN, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT JEAN HILL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: May 30, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 07-420-TC (D. Or. May. 30, 2007)