From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 21, 2019
Civil Case 3:18-CV-2300-B-BK (N.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2019)

Summary

dismissing with prejudice when pro se plaintiff failed to comply with court order and case had been pending for more than four months, despite two extensions

Summary of this case from Bivens v. United States

Opinion

Civil Case 3:18-CV-2300-B-BK

02-21-2019

TERRANCE DUNN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL HERNANDEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to comply with a court order and for want of prosecution. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

The Court prospectively certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions and recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the findings, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). In the event of an appeal, Plaintiff may challenge this certification by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(5).

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs the time to appeal an order. A timely notice of appeal must be filed even if the district court certifies an appeal as not taken in good faith. --------

SO ORDERED this 21st Day of February, 2019.

/s/ _________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dunn v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 21, 2019
Civil Case 3:18-CV-2300-B-BK (N.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2019)

dismissing with prejudice when pro se plaintiff failed to comply with court order and case had been pending for more than four months, despite two extensions

Summary of this case from Bivens v. United States
Case details for

Dunn v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:TERRANCE DUNN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL HERNANDEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Feb 21, 2019

Citations

Civil Case 3:18-CV-2300-B-BK (N.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2019)

Citing Cases

Buerger v. Clifton

Other federal district courts in Texas have dismissed with prejudice cases under considerably similar…

Bivens v. United States

Thus, dismissal is appropriate in this case, even if Plaintiff will be precluded by limitations from pursuing…