From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Gonzales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2014
No. CV 13-2628 GHK (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2014)

Opinion

No. CV 13-2628 GHK (FFM)

04-03-2014

MANUEL DUNN, Petitioner, v. MAURICE A. GONZALES, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss is granted and that judgment is entered denying the petition with prejudice.

________

GEORGE H. KING

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dunn v. Gonzales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2014
No. CV 13-2628 GHK (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Dunn v. Gonzales

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL DUNN, Petitioner, v. MAURICE A. GONZALES, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 3, 2014

Citations

No. CV 13-2628 GHK (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2014)

Citing Cases

Von Staich v. Ferguson

Other courts have held that the BPH's consideration of confidential information which was not provided to the…