From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 28, 2016
Case No. 13-CV-4398 (KMK) (JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 28, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 13-CV-4398 (KMK) (JCM)

11-28-2016

CRAIG A. DUNN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING R&R

:

On September 21, 2016, Magistrate Judge McCarthy entered a Report & Recommendation (the "R&R") recommending that this Court grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. (R&R 8 (Dkt. No. 24).) In the thorough R&R, Judge McCarthy provided notice that objections to the R&R were due within 14 days and that failure to object would preclude later appellate review of any order of judgment that will be entered. (Id. at 8-9.) No objections were filed.

Because no objections have been filed, the Court reviews the R&R "only for clear error on the face of the record." See Brennan v. Colvin, No. 13-CV-6338, 2015 WL 1402204, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Iannolo v. Astrue, No. 10-CV-7602, 2012 WL 523619, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 16, 2012) (same). Having reviewed the R&R for clear error and finding none, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety.

Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motion, (Dkt. No. 16), and close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 28, 2016

White Plains, New York

/s/_________

KENNETH M. KARAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dunn v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 28, 2016
Case No. 13-CV-4398 (KMK) (JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Dunn v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG A. DUNN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 28, 2016

Citations

Case No. 13-CV-4398 (KMK) (JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 28, 2016)

Citing Cases

Romero ex rel. Crisostomo v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

A "[d]ismissal for failure to appear at the hearing does not constitute a final decision on the merits and…

Coe v. Saul

This interpretation conforms to cases in this district decided both before after Smith In Nunez v. Saul, this…