From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 13, 2003
301 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-05714, 2001-09753

Submitted October 4, 2002.

January 13, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant City of New York appeals (1), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated May 10, 2001, as denied that branch of its motion which was pursuant to CPLR 4404(a) to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against it on the issue of liability, and (2) from an interlocutory judgment of the same court, entered October 30, 2001, upon the jury verdict.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Stephen J. McGrath and Cheryl Payer of counsel), for appellant.

O'Leary O'Leary, Jamaica, N.Y. (Alexander J. Wulwick of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, SANDRA L. TOWNES, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order and interlocutory judgment are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the plaintiff introduced sufficient evidence from which a rational jury could have concluded that it was "more likely" or "more reasonable" that a vehicle crossed over to the plaintiff's side of the road, and caused an accident because of the appellant's negligent design and signage of the area rather "than by some other agency" (Gayle v. City of New York, 92 N.Y.2d 936, 937; see Schneider v. Kings Highway Hosp. Center, 67 N.Y.2d 743). Furthermore, the jury determination that an oncoming vehicle entered the plaintiff's lane of traffic was not against the weight of the evidence since it was supported by a "fair interpretation" of the evidence adduced at trial (Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129).

Finally, under the circumstances of this case, reversal is not warranted on the basis of the trial court's erroneous admission of testimony regarding alleged prior accidents at the subject intersection (see Grcic v. City of New York, 139 A.D.2d 621; Giordano v. MacMurray Motors, 18 A.D.2d 916).

SANTUCCI, J.P., SCHMIDT, TOWNES and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dunn v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 13, 2003
301 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Dunn v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT L. DUNN, respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 13, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
752 N.Y.S.2d 895

Citing Cases

Chase v Circle Auto. Equip. Specialists, Inc.

To meet this burden, a plaintiff is not required to prove the exact nature of the defendant's negligence (see…

Chase v. Circle Auto. Equip. Specialists, Inc.

to exclude every other possible cause for the injury-producing event ( see Burgos v Aqueduct Realty Corp., 92…