From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DUNN v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2010
No. CV-08-0873-NVW (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010)

Opinion

No. CV-08-0873-NVW.

February 2, 2010


ORDER


By order of January 12, 2010, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss was granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. # 31.) Therefore, Defendants' time to file an answer to the First Amended Complaint expired on January 26, 2010. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(4)(A). No answer has been filed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause by February 19, 2010, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution unless an application for entry of default or answer to the First Amended Complaint is filed before then.


Summaries of

DUNN v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2010
No. CV-08-0873-NVW (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010)
Case details for

DUNN v. CATE

Case Details

Full title:Phillip Dunn Plaintiff, v. Matthew Cate, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 2, 2010

Citations

No. CV-08-0873-NVW (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010)