From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Bruno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

March, 1930.


Order of filiation of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial ordered. We are of opinion that the determination was against the weight of the credible evidence, especially in light of the fact that the complainant failed to take the witness stand to contradict the testimony of the witnesses Hutchinson and Hannah. Lazansky, P.J., Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Young and Hagarty, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.


Summaries of

Dunn v. Bruno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Dunn v. Bruno

Case Details

Full title:C.J. DUNN, Acting Commissioner of Public Welfare of the City of New York…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)