From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunmore v. Dunmore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2012
CIV. NO. S-11-2867 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

CIV. NO. S-11-2867 MCE GGH PS

01-10-2012

STEVEN G. DUNMORE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JEREMY A. DUNMORE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Defendant Dunmore's motion to dismiss and to strike presently is calendared for hearing on January 19, 2012. The notice of removal has attached only five pages of a first amended complaint alleged to be 66 or 84 pages long. (Mot. at 3.) The court cannot determine if a hearing is necessary without reviewing the entirety of the first amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: Defendant Dunsmore shall file a copy of the complete first amended complaint forthwith. Upon review of this pleading the court will determine whether the January 19, 2012 hearing is necessary.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GGH:076:Dunmore2867.fac.wpd


Summaries of

Dunmore v. Dunmore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2012
CIV. NO. S-11-2867 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Dunmore v. Dunmore

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN G. DUNMORE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JEREMY A. DUNMORE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

CIV. NO. S-11-2867 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)