Dunmore v. Dunmore

Full title: STEVEN G. DUNMORE, Plaintiff, v. JEREMY A. DUNMORE, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 15, 2013

2:11-cv-02867 MCE AC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2013)

Opinion

STEVEN G. DUNMORE, Plaintiff, v. JEREMY A. DUNMORE, et al., Defendants. No. 2:11-cv-02867 MCE AC United States District Court, E.D. California. April 15, 2013

          ORDER

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

         Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

         On March 7, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 109.) No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

         The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 109) filed March 7, 2013, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Plaintiff's August 29, 2012, Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike (ECF No. 67) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's motion to strike is DENIED as to Sidney B.'s denials for lack of personal knowledge. The motion is GRANTED in all other respects; and

3. Defendants are granted leave to amend their counterclaims.