Opinion
Civil Action No. 14-1699 (UNA)
12-12-2014
Jermaine J. Dunlap, Plaintiff, v. Superior Court of the City of San Bernardino et al., Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff is a California state prisoner who has submitted yet another document comprised of incoherent statements and inexplicable attachments. "Similar to the plaintiff's prior actions, this action is difficult to comprehend." Dunlap v. Dep't of Review Board, No. 14-0145, 2014 WL 414156 (D.D.C. Jan. 30, 2014), citing Dunlap v. Board of Prison Hearings, No. 1:08-cv-1770, 2009 WL 1759651, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2009) (dismissing amended habeas petition presenting "the same incomprehensible allegations [stated] on three separate [prior] occasions"). The document initiating this action presents no discernible facts to state a claim. Hence, this case will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Dunlap, 2014 WL 414156 (same). A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
/s/_________
United States District Judge
Date: December 12, 2014