From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunlap v. Neven

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 18, 2010
Case No. 2:09-cv-2394-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. May. 18, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-2394-RLH-PAL.

May 18, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, who is in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are the following motions submitted by Plaintiff: Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (#2), Motion for Permission of Filing (#1), Motion for Summary Judgment (#3), Motion to Compel Identification (#4), and Motion to Amend Complaint (#8).

Based on the financial information provided, the Court finds that Plaintiff is unable to pay an initial partial filing fee. However, even if this action is dismissed, the full filing fee of $350.00 must still be paid pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court grants Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (#2).

Plaintiff submitted a Motion for Permission of Filing (#1) seeking leave to include additional pages with the civil rights complaint form. The Court grants Plaintiff's Motion for Permission of Filing (#1).

Plaintiff submitted a Motion for Summary Judgment (#3) and a Motion to Attach supplemental information in support of his motion for summary judgment (#4). Plaintiff's complaint has not yet been screened by the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Additionally, the defendants have not been served or responded to the complaint. Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (#3) and motion to supplement (#4) are premature and are denied without prejudice.

Plaintiff also submitted a Motion to Compel Identification (#4) seeking that the Court issue an order compelling the defendants to provide accurate names and job descriptions of all defendants listed in his complaint so that he may have accurate information to file an amended complaint. The Court observes that the plaintiff has already submitted a motion to amend his complaint, with a proposed amended complaint attached. See #8. Thus, the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Identification (#4) without prejudice.

Plaintiff request permission to amend his civil rights complaint and attached a proposed amended complaint. (#8). Plaintiff may amend his complaint once as a matter of course because Defendants have not yet responded to his original complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). The Court grants Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (#8).

Based on the foregoing, and with good cause appearing,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (#2) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall not be required to pay an initial partial filing fee. However, even if this action is dismissed, the full filing fee must still be paid pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the movant herein is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without the necessity of prepayment of any additional fees or costs or the giving of security therefor. This order granting forma pauperis status shall not extend to the issuance of subpoenas at government expense.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), the Nevada Department of Corrections shall pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court, District of Nevada, 20% of the preceding month's deposits to Plaintiff's account (inmate #90083), in the months that the account exceeds $10.00, until the full $350 filing fee has been paid for this action. The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to the Finance Division of the Clerk's Office. The Clerk shall also send a copy of this Order to the attention of the Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada Department of Corrections, P.O. Box 7011, Carson City, NV 89702.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Permission of Filing (#1) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (#3) and Motion to Attach/Supplement (#4) are DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Identification (#4) is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (#8) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (#8-1) shall be DETACHED from the motion and FILED. The Clerk of the Court shall withhold service at this time.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case will be screened as required pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A as soon as the Court's schedule permits and in the order that it was received. The Clerk of the Court shall retain the amended complaint at this time.


Summaries of

Dunlap v. Neven

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 18, 2010
Case No. 2:09-cv-2394-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. May. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Dunlap v. Neven

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE TYRONE DUNLAP, JR., Plaintiff, v. WARDEN NEVEN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 18, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-2394-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. May. 18, 2010)