From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunlap v. Neven

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 17, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-02394-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. May. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-02394-RLH-GWF.

May 17, 2011


ORDER Motion to Extend (#43)


This matter is before the Court on Defendants Dwight Neven, Cole Morrow, Isidro Baca, Gervais Gayle, Robert Owens, Bruce Stroud and Kelly Mellinger's Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Complaint (Second Request) (#43), filed May 16, 2011.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b) and LR 6, extensions of time may be granted for good cause shown. Defendants request a 30 day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (#24) due to personnel issues in the Attorney General's Office. The Court finds Defendants have shown good cause for an extension. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Complaint (#43) is granted. Defendants will have until June 17, 2011 to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (#24).


Summaries of

Dunlap v. Neven

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 17, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-02394-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. May. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Dunlap v. Neven

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE TYRONE DUNLAP JR., Plaintiff, v. DWIGHT NEVEN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 17, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-02394-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. May. 17, 2011)