From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunlap-Hurden v. Mahle, Inc;

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 24, 2009
Case No. 09-CV-11123 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 24, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 09-CV-11123.

April 24, 2009


ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL


Plaintiff Dania Dunlap-Hurden filed a four-count complaint against defendants Mahle, Inc., Mahle Industries, Inc.; Mahle Powertrain, LLC.; and Mahle Technology, Inc., alleging the following causes of action: Count I, violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000(e) et seq; Count II, violations of the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3; Count III, violations of Michigan's Elliot Larsen Civil Rights Act ("ELCRA"), Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. §§ 37.2101, et seq.; and Count IV, retaliation under the ELCRA.

While claims alleging violations of federal law are cognizable in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the remaining allegations in the complaint present claims based on state law. The parties to this matter are not diverse. Therefore, this court declines to exercise pendent jurisdiction over the state claims.See United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966); 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Counts III and IV are DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Dunlap-Hurden v. Mahle, Inc;

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 24, 2009
Case No. 09-CV-11123 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 24, 2009)
Case details for

Dunlap-Hurden v. Mahle, Inc;

Case Details

Full title:DANIA DUNLAP-HURDEN, Plaintiff, v. MAHLE, INC; MAHLE INDUSTRIES, INC…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Apr 24, 2009

Citations

Case No. 09-CV-11123 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 24, 2009)