From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunkin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 12, 2016
188 So. 3d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D16–1185.

04-12-2016

Jeremy W. DUNKIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Jeremy W. Dunkin, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy W. Dunkin, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED as premature.

WOLF, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Dunkin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 12, 2016
188 So. 3d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Dunkin v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jeremy W. DUNKIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Apr 12, 2016

Citations

188 So. 3d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)