From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunkin v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 4, 2010
Case No. 5:10-CV-00055-JLH-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jun. 4, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 5:10-CV-00055-JLH-JTK.

June 4, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner is hereby informed of his opportunity to reply within thirty (30) days to Respondent's arguments in his Response (DE #13) that the petition should be dismissed because Petitioner's first two claims are procedurally barred and his last two claims address matters of state law and are therefore not cognizable in a federal habeas petition, or alternatively, are procedurally barred. Petitioner may reply to any other argument in the Response.

The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of the Response (DE #13) and this Order on Petitioner by regular mail.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Dunkin v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 4, 2010
Case No. 5:10-CV-00055-JLH-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jun. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Dunkin v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:JERAD KEITH DUNKIN PETITIONER ADC # 144105 v. RAY HOBBS, Interim Director…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Jun 4, 2010

Citations

Case No. 5:10-CV-00055-JLH-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jun. 4, 2010)