From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunkart v. Henry

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1882
87 N.C. 228 (N.C. 1882)

Opinion

(October Term, 1882.)

(For syllabus, see preceding case.)

MOTION for injunction heard at Chambers in Asheville on the 14th of March, 1882, (in an action pending in HAYWOOD Superior Court) before Gilliam, J.

The motion was denied and the plaintiff appealed.

Mr. J. H. Merrimon, for plaintiff. (229)

No counsel for defendant.


The facts of this case are very similar to those in Dunkart v. Rinehart, ante, 224. The difference in the state of facts is not sufficiently material as to effect the application of the doctrine announced in that case; and our opinion is, the principle there enunciated governs this case, and there is therefore no error in the denial by his Honor of the motion of the plaintiff.

Let this be certified to the superior court of Haywood County where the cause is pending.

No error. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Dunkart v. Henry

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1882
87 N.C. 228 (N.C. 1882)
Case details for

Dunkart v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:HENRY DUNKART v. JOHN A. HENRY AND ANOTHER

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1882

Citations

87 N.C. 228 (N.C. 1882)

Citing Cases

Troy v. Norment

Decree accordingly. Cited: Gause v. Perkins, 56 N.C. 182; Dunkhart v. Rinehart, 87 N.C. 228; Marshall v.…

Purnell v. Daniel

Approved: Capehart v. Mhoon, 45 N.C. 34; McNeely v. Steele, id., 244; Lloyd v. Heath, 45 N.C. 42; Ashe v.…