From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunigan v. CDCR

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 22, 2021
2:19-cv-2501 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-2501 WBS AC P

06-22-2021

KEVIN DUNIGAN, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B.SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By order filed March 26, 2020, this action was dismissed, ECF No. 22, and judgment was entered the same day, ECF No. 23. On June 3, 2021, plaintiff filed an amended petition for writ of error coram nobis. The motion is incomprehensible and fails to identify any grounds for relief.

Since plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se, he is afforded the benefit of the prison mailbox rule. Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's amended motion for writ of error coram nobis, ECF No. 37, is denied. Any further such motions shall be disregarded.


Summaries of

Dunigan v. CDCR

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 22, 2021
2:19-cv-2501 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Dunigan v. CDCR

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN DUNIGAN, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 22, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-2501 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2021)