From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunham v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1999
262 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued April 27, 1999

June 14, 1999

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated May 5, 1998, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Lawrence Heisler of counsel), for appellant.

Domenic M. Recchia (DiJoseph, Portegello Schuster, P.C., New York, N.Y. [Arnold E. DiJoseph III] of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents.

On March 20, 1995, the plaintiff was a passenger on a bus operated by the appellant, the New York City Transit Authority. When the bus stopped, the plaintiff, upon exiting, allegedly fell over a cracked, defective portion of the sidewalk in front of where she exited the bus.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion for summary judgment. There are issues of fact as to whether the plaintiff was provided with a safe place to alight and whether there was a safe path away from the bus ( see, Miller v. Fernan, 73 N.Y.2d 844, 846; cf., Otonoga v. City of New York, 234 A.D.2d 592).


Summaries of

Dunham v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1999
262 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Dunham v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ANN DUNHAM, plaintiff-respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 115

Citing Cases

Kadymir v. N.Y. City

Accordingly, the NYCTA owed the plaintiff a duty to stop at a place where she could safely disembark and…

Rios v. Cty. of N.Y

A common carrier owes a duty to an alighting passenger to stop at a place where the passenger may safely…