From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunham v. Caruso

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 30, 2006
Case No. 1:03-cv-862 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 30, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:03-cv-862.

October 30, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On August 23, 2006, United States Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody issued a Report and Recommendation ("R R") recommending that Russell Percy Dunham's petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as time-barred. Petitioner has filed objections to the R R. The court, having reviewed the R R filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, and having considered petitioner's objections, agrees with the recommended disposition contained in the R R.

It is noted that the R R contains a typographical error. At page 5, the first sentence of the second full paragraph reads as follows: "Here, the limitations period ran for 231 days from December 29, 1997 to August 18, 199 7 . . ." (emphasis supplied). The latter date should instead read "August 18, 1998," not August 18, 1997. However, this typographical error does not alter the correctness of the result.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.


Summaries of

Dunham v. Caruso

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 30, 2006
Case No. 1:03-cv-862 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Dunham v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL PERCY DUNHAM, Petitioner, v. PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 30, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:03-cv-862 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 30, 2006)