From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dundas v. Doyle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 4, 2013
Case No. 2:11-CV-02107-KJD-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-02107-KJD-PAL

02-04-2013

EDWARD F. DUNDAS, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY A. DOYLE, Defendant.


ORDER

Before the Court for consideration is the Report & Recommendation (#2) of Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen, recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LR IB 3-2. Based on its review, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Leen's determination that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice because it fails to state any claim upon which relief can be granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Report & Recommendation (#4) of Magistrate Judge Leen, should be ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED.

____________________

Kent J. Dawson

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dundas v. Doyle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 4, 2013
Case No. 2:11-CV-02107-KJD-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Dundas v. Doyle

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD F. DUNDAS, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY A. DOYLE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 4, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-02107-KJD-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 4, 2013)