From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duncombe v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 9, 2014
157 So. 3d 1043 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC14–1498.

12-09-2014

Roger D. DUNCOMBE, Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Opinion

The petition for writ of prohibition is hereby denied because petitioner has failed to demonstrate that a lower court is attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction. See Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So.2d 850 (Fla.1992) ; English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla.1977). No motion for rehearing will be entertained by this Court.

PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Duncombe v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 9, 2014
157 So. 3d 1043 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Duncombe v. State

Case Details

Full title:Roger D. DUNCOMBE, Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Dec 9, 2014

Citations

157 So. 3d 1043 (Fla. 2014)