From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunckhurst v. Lopez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 13, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1405 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1405 GEB EFB P.

September 13, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's September 6, 2011 motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Dunckhurst v. Lopez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 13, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1405 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Dunckhurst v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN DUNCKHURST, Petitioner, v. RAUL LOPEZ, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1405 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)