Duncan v. State

Full title: RONALD EDWIN DUNCAN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jan 11, 2006

Nos. 09-05-210 CR, 09-05-211 CR (Tex. App. Jan. 11, 2006)

Opinion

Nos. 09-05-210 CR, 09-05-211 CR

Opinion Delivered January 11, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Appeal from the County Court, San Jacinto County, Texas, Trial Cause Nos. 04-342 and 04-343. Appeals Dismissed.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., KREGER and HORTON, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES KREGER, Justice.

On December 1, 2005, we notified the parties that the appeals would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the records or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the records. The appellant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex.R.App.P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the records, the appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex.R.App.P. 37.3(b).