From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duncan v. State

Court of Appeals of Mississippi
May 15, 2003
850 So. 2d 152 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. 2001-CP-01511-COA.

May 6, 2003. Rehearing Filed May 15, 2003. Rehearing Denied July 15, 2003.

COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, TRIAL JUDGE: HON. GRAY EVANS, DATE OF TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT: 6/7/2001

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: WENDELL DUNCAN (PRO SE)

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: JEAN SMITH VAUGHAN

DISTRICT ATTORNEY: FRANK CARLTON

BEFORE SOUTHWICK, P.J., BRIDGES AND CHANDLER, JJ.


¶ 1. This is a collateral appeal under the Post-Conviction Relief Act from the Washington County Circuit Court where Wendell Duncan was indicted on two charges, shooting into an occupied dwelling (cause no. 18,245) and aggravated assault (cause no. 18,246). According to the partial transcript, at the plea hearing Duncan pled as a habitual offender under Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-83. The trial court held that the State did not satisfy the provisions of the habitual statute and thus Duncan was sentenced to a thirty year term on the conviction of armed robbery to run consecutively to a previously imposed sentence of twelve years on a burglary conviction.

¶ 2. Duncan's first motion for post-conviction relief was earlier addressed and his second motion, termed a "Writ of Habeas Corpus", seeking relief from his sentence was denied by the circuit court as a successive petition under the Post-Conviction Relief Act. Duncan now appeals to this Court.

¶ 3. This motion is prohibited by Miss. Code Ann. § 99 39 27(9) (Supp. 2002) which provides, "the dismissal or denial of an application under this section is a final judgment and shall be a bar to a second or successive application under this chapter." The record reflects that Duncan brought his initial motion for post-conviction relief about January 17, 1996, which was later denied by the circuit court. This constitutes his second motion which is procedurally barred under Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-27 (Supp 2002).

¶ 4. Duncan's motion is also time barred as it does not fall within the allotted three year time limitation. Miss. Code Ann. § 99 39 5(2) states in part: "a motion for relief under this chapter shall be made within three years after the time in which the prisoner's direct appeal is ruled upon by the Supreme Court of Mississippi or . . . in case of a guilty plea, within three (3) years after entry of the judgment of conviction." Miss. Code Ann. § 99 39 5(2) (Supp. 2002). Thus, Duncan's motion is time barred as well.

¶ 5. THE JUDGMENT OF THE WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT DENYING POST-CONVICTION RELIEF IS AFFIRMED. COSTS ARE ASSESSED TO WASHINGTON COUNTY. McMILLIN, C.J. AND SOUTHWICK, P.JJ., THOMAS, LEE, MYERS, CHANDLER AND GRIFFIS, JJ., CONCUR. IRVING, J., CONCURS IN RESULT ONLY. KING, P.J., NOT PARTICIPATING.


Summaries of

Duncan v. State

Court of Appeals of Mississippi
May 15, 2003
850 So. 2d 152 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Duncan v. State

Case Details

Full title:WENDELL DUNCAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Date published: May 15, 2003

Citations

850 So. 2d 152 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003)
2001 CP 1511

Citing Cases

Farris v. State

Mississippi Code Annotated § 99-39-5(2) states, in part: "[a] motion for relief under this article shall be…