From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duncan v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jun 21, 1919
181 P. 739 (Okla. Crim. App. 1919)

Opinion

No. A-2904.

Opinion Filed June 21, 1919.

Appeal from County Court, Ellis County; S.A. Miller, Judge.

Donald Duncan was convicted of the offense of obstructing a public highway, and sentenced to pay a fine of $5 and costs of the action, and he appeals. Affirmed.

C.B. Leedy, for plaintiff in error.

S.P. Freeling, Atty. Gen., and R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Plaintiff in error, Donald Duncan, was convicted in the county court of Ellis county of the offense of obstructing a public highway, described in the information as follows:

"The section line highway running east and west between sections 5 and 8, in township 18, north of range 22, West Indian meridian, in Ellis county, state of Oklahoma, at a point at and near the point where the half section line running north and south across said section crosses said section line highway," etc.

A trial was had before the court, and punishment assessed at a fine of $5 and the costs of the prosecution. From said judgment of conviction an appeal has been taken to this court.

The questions involved are identical with those raised in the appeal of this plaintiff in error in case No. 2884, 16 Okla. Cr. 175, 181 P. 736, this day decided adversely to the contentions of plaintiff in error. For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Duncan v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jun 21, 1919
181 P. 739 (Okla. Crim. App. 1919)
Case details for

Duncan v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD DUNCAN v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 21, 1919

Citations

181 P. 739 (Okla. Crim. App. 1919)
16 Okla. Crim. 683

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

In 1 Freeman on Judgments, fifth edition, page 603, paragraph 305, the author states the rule as follows:…

Oregon Mortgage Co. v. Kunneke

Had the mistake been discovered at the time proof was admitted, the court might properly have permitted an…